Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::: <math>\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{j}</math> | ::: <math>\nabla \times \mathbf{H} = \mathbf{j}</math> | ||
| | | | ||
− | :: (1) | + | ::: (1) |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
::: <math>\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0</math> | ::: <math>\nabla \cdot \mathbf{B} = 0</math> | ||
| | | | ||
− | :: (2) | + | ::: (2) |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
::: <math>\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \mathbf{0}</math> | ::: <math>\nabla \times \mathbf{E} = \mathbf{0}</math> | ||
| | | | ||
− | :: (3) | + | ::: (3) |
|- | |- | ||
| | | | ||
::: <math>\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} = \rho_e</math> | ::: <math>\nabla \cdot \mathbf{D} = \rho_e</math> | ||
| | | | ||
− | :: (4) | + | ::: (4) |
|} | |} | ||
Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
{| | {| | ||
| | | | ||
− | ::: <math>\mathbf{B}=\mu_0(\mathbf{H} + \mathbf{M}</math> | + | ::: <math>\mathbf{B}=\mu_0(\mathbf{H} + \mathbf{M})</math> |
| | | | ||
::: (5) | ::: (5) | ||
|} | |} | ||
+ | with <math>\mathbf{M}</math> (sometimes also called <math>\mathbf{J}</math>) is the magnetic polarization vector (or more generally, the magnetization of a medium) in <math>A.m^{-1}</math> (Ampère per mètre) | ||
+ | <math>\mathbf{M}</math> is a quantity that exists only inside magnetic materials (magnets, current loops or magnetized media like iron) and it can take various forms, hence the constant change in formulas that was bothering me. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Indeed, you can distinguish 2 cases: | ||
+ | # Permanent Magnets, where <math>\mathbf{M}</math> is actually "generated" from the magnet as the statistic macroscopic sum of all the small microscopic dipoles <math>\mathbf{dM}</math> | ||
+ | # Magnetic Materials, where <math>\mathbf{M}</math> is actually <u>induced</u> by the external magnetic field in which the material is set. In that case, <math>\mathbf{M}</math> is then a factor of <math>\mathbf{H}</math>, the external field, but also generates itself a new <math>\mathbf{H'}</math> coming from its own magnetization. | ||
_ | _ |
Revision as of 16:18, 11 February 2010
For a special project of mine that will certainly revolution the entire world , I needed to understand basic Electro-Magnetism theory.
This page deals with my encounter and difficulties but also with the results of my research.
Electro-Magnetism
Electro-Magnetism is a huge but absolutely necessary and fundamental domain in physics as it's the basis for most physical phenomena and study fields like optics, radio-astronomy, quantum physics, electronics, particles study, etc.
Electricity and magnetism were first seen as two distinct phenomena until the work of famous scientists like Ampère, Gauss, Faraday or Maxwell actually made the two inter-related. More than inter-related : actually inseparable from one another.
To test my Tex package, I'll list the 4 beautiful Maxwell equations (in stationary regime) that tie electricity and magnetism but also completely define them :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
where Boldface symbols are vectors, regular symbols are simple scalars and
<math>\mathbf{H}</math> is the magnetic field strength (or magnetic intensity) in <math>A.m^{-1}</math> (Ampère per mètre)
<math>\mathbf{B}</math> is the magnetic flux density (or magnetic induction) in <math>T</math> (Tesla)
<math>\mathbf{D}</math> is the electric flux density (or electric induction) in <math>C.m^{-2}</math> (Coulomb per square mètre)
<math>\mathbf{E}</math> is the electric field strength (or electric intensity) in <math>V.m^{-1}</math> (Volt per mètre)
<math>\mathbf{j}</math> is the free current density (that is, the current density related to the transport of free electric charges) in <math>A.m^{-2}</math> (Ampère per square mètre)
<math>\rho_e</math> is the volume density of free electric charges in <math>C.m^{-3}</math> (Coulomb per cubic mètre)
Notice the beautiful symmetry in these 4 equations. We will mostly leave the electric field equations aside in the following and concentrate on the magnetic field equations.
Typically, equations (1) and (2) simply mean that a magnetic field line always closes back to the emitter and that the net magnetic flux is always 0 as there is always the same amount that goes off from a surface that comes back into it, as stated in the following Gauss equation :
- <math>\oint_S \mathbf{B} \cdot dA = 0</math> (for a closed surface)
In Practice
As always, physics manuals are great if you already understand what the guy is talking about. Also, they always use the examples of solenoids with a current and a given number of coils whereas, although I knew electric current and magnetic fields are always strongly related, I needed a book that took me to the origins : permanent magnets.
After quite a long research I came out with some knowledge that I mainly gathered from an old book from 1942 simply called "Cours de Physique pour les classes de Mathématiques Spéciales" (Physics Course for Special Mathematics classes) by M. Joyal. This book is awesome ! It explains everything with clean drawings and I can't quite figure out why no one ever writes books like these anymore.
Anyway, there was a key equation that was always driving me mad as the terms were changing on and on, I'm speaking of :
|
|
with <math>\mathbf{M}</math> (sometimes also called <math>\mathbf{J}</math>) is the magnetic polarization vector (or more generally, the magnetization of a medium) in <math>A.m^{-1}</math> (Ampère per mètre)
<math>\mathbf{M}</math> is a quantity that exists only inside magnetic materials (magnets, current loops or magnetized media like iron) and it can take various forms, hence the constant change in formulas that was bothering me.
Indeed, you can distinguish 2 cases:
- Permanent Magnets, where <math>\mathbf{M}</math> is actually "generated" from the magnet as the statistic macroscopic sum of all the small microscopic dipoles <math>\mathbf{dM}</math>
- Magnetic Materials, where <math>\mathbf{M}</math> is actually induced by the external magnetic field in which the material is set. In that case, <math>\mathbf{M}</math> is then a factor of <math>\mathbf{H}</math>, the external field, but also generates itself a new <math>\mathbf{H'}</math> coming from its own magnetization.
_