From Wakapon
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 6: Line 6:
 
== Politics ==
 
== Politics ==
  
First, you should know I'm a fucking social anarchist [[File:S2.gif]]. And as such, I don't like the inherent hierarchy of the powers in place and their ugly scheming to get to the top. I just can't stand politics and corruption. I just can't grasp the concept of the lust for power and money. And I can't even begin to understand why someone who has enough money to buy a small country just needs even more.
+
First, you should know I'm a fucking social anarchist [[File:S2.gif]]. And as such, I don't like the inherent hierarchy of the powers in place and their ugly scheming to get to the top. I just can't stand politics and corruption. I just can't grasp the concept of lust for power and money. And I can't even begin to understand why someone who has enough money to buy a small country just needs even more.
  
 
Let me be clear on these thoughts : I don't want to blow up everything, shoot everyone and make a revolution. Our capitalist system is obviously far from perfect but I believe it can be "mended" in many ways so we achieve more equality in the revenues and so a huge part of the world isn't left aside like junk. I would have liked not to quote the obvious here, like the richest 2% own half the wealth of the planet, or that the cost of the war in Iraq on its own would have permitted to buy all the weapons we're so afraid of, or even that it would cost 40 billion $ annually to feed the hungry (the budget of the G8 summits where "important" people discuss of this matter costing $600 million on its own) but I write these small facts here as a memento for some other time.
 
Let me be clear on these thoughts : I don't want to blow up everything, shoot everyone and make a revolution. Our capitalist system is obviously far from perfect but I believe it can be "mended" in many ways so we achieve more equality in the revenues and so a huge part of the world isn't left aside like junk. I would have liked not to quote the obvious here, like the richest 2% own half the wealth of the planet, or that the cost of the war in Iraq on its own would have permitted to buy all the weapons we're so afraid of, or even that it would cost 40 billion $ annually to feed the hungry (the budget of the G8 summits where "important" people discuss of this matter costing $600 million on its own) but I write these small facts here as a memento for some other time.

Revision as of 03:16, 12 February 2010

Okay, let me try and explain what this great idea is about. S13.gif

First, let's see some basic politics as an introduction to what I will expose later.


Politics

First, you should know I'm a fucking social anarchist S2.gif. And as such, I don't like the inherent hierarchy of the powers in place and their ugly scheming to get to the top. I just can't stand politics and corruption. I just can't grasp the concept of lust for power and money. And I can't even begin to understand why someone who has enough money to buy a small country just needs even more.

Let me be clear on these thoughts : I don't want to blow up everything, shoot everyone and make a revolution. Our capitalist system is obviously far from perfect but I believe it can be "mended" in many ways so we achieve more equality in the revenues and so a huge part of the world isn't left aside like junk. I would have liked not to quote the obvious here, like the richest 2% own half the wealth of the planet, or that the cost of the war in Iraq on its own would have permitted to buy all the weapons we're so afraid of, or even that it would cost 40 billion $ annually to feed the hungry (the budget of the G8 summits where "important" people discuss of this matter costing $600 million on its own) but I write these small facts here as a memento for some other time.


Keeping that in mind, after spending many years being angry at everything, we need to focus on finding ways to change things and make the system more equal.

Politicians, whether they are left-wing liberal democrats or right-wing conservative republicans, all want the same thing : power. They usually have a short-term vision of things essentially because of their equally short-term mandates. Often laws and amendments get voted to be overruled 1 or 2 presidential mandates later, yielding a brownian-motion-like status quo. Also, these politicians are almost always issued from bourgeoisie and aristocracy, they are formed and taught in high-standard schools whose diplomas always guarantee a successful career. These people are NOT of your friends, they are not of your class and don't know the cost of life or the difficulties and precarity of life, yet they are there to solve your problems they don't have a clue about. They only are theoreticians of life.

Also, it is my intimate conviction that politicians have no real power anymore and don't rule their country as they used to : multi-national corporations do through lobbying and economic pressure. Politicians can only limit the damages caused to their countries by these corporations (when they are willing to do so) by applying mere patches and solving neighborhood-range crises, when they are not altogether at the mercy of such corporations through either economic blackmail or mere corruption.

Politicians have become CEOs of their countries they now run like mere corporations. We're the employees. Revolving doors between government positions and private sector companies work 24-7. Conflicts of interest are now showing blatantly in the open and are part of the system.

Another one of my convictions is that the economic system in place is anti-human in all its forms. I mean it's not in the interest of the market, ever, that people are happy and in good health ! If people were all well fed, all had shelter, all were in good health and were all happy with simple facts of life instead of pursuing "happiness" through consumption, then the market would collapse.


What we need is a way to make the people in place take their job seriously. We need a way to monitor what they are doing, what are their agendas and what possible conflicts of interest they are in : we need to find a way to make them do the work they were elected for. The "affairs" newspapers sometimes leak are mere accidents, I'm sure there are hundreds of these affairs we never hear of and that's a shame. If we ever had a way to somewhat automatically find relations between people, trace their life and monitor their quotes and achievements then we would have a tool to actually "measure" the honesty and value of these people.

They are, after all, public persons elected by the public. It's only fair to assume they should be accountable to the public !


What's the Relation with Semantic Analysis ?